Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Cisco Systems Inc. said it will begin paying a dividend

What can I say but: as identified some time ago in my previous Blogs that US corps will start to pay dividends.

Aivars Lode


By CARI TUNA
Cisco Systems Inc. said it will begin paying a dividend, becoming the latest technology behemoth to start returning cash to shareholders as the companies have matured.

Cisco's dividend yield—or the payout as a percentage of the company's share price—will be 1% to 2%, said Chief Executive John Chambers during a meeting Tuesday with financial analysts.

The San Jose, Calif., networking-technology company will begin paying the dividend before the close of its current fiscal year ending July 31, 2011, he added.

The decision follows calls from investors for Cisco to return some of its cash hoard to shareholders. Cisco held $39.9 billion in cash as of July 31, up from $35 billion a year earlier.

Cisco shares rose 19 cents, or less than 1%, to $21.45 at 4 p.m. on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

In the past, the company has largely used its cash to make acquisitions and to repurchase its shares. Cisco has spent $65 billion on stock buybacks in the last nine years, said Chief Financial Officer Frank Calderoni.

Cisco is the latest large tech company to begin issuing a dividend. Historically, tech companies shunned dividends, viewing them as a trapping of mature companies, rather than young, fast-growing concerns.

But as growth rates of many of the tech giants have slowed over time, many have begun returning their cash through dividends.

Microsoft Corp. began issuing a dividend in 2003. Last year, Oracle Corp. began paying a dividend, even as companies in other industries cut back their dividend payouts amid the economic downturn.

Cisco's growth rate has slowed over the past decade. Whereas it once posted annual revenue growth of 30% to 60% during the dot-com boom, the company's annual growth rate for the past five fiscal years has averaged around 10%.

Cisco has said it is aiming for 12% to 17% annualized growth rates over the next three to five years and has broadened its portfolio of products to goose its growth.

Mr. Chambers had said repeatedly that Cisco would pay a dividend before his retirement. Following the dividend announcement, the longtime CEO said he would continue in his position for at least three to five more years.

Mr. Chambers said Cisco will decide in early 2011 whether the dividend yield will be closer to 1% or 2%, based on whether the U.S. government raises taxes on dividends at the end of 2010.

He added that the size of the dividend also will depend on whether the government eases taxes on the repatriation of corporate cash holdings overseas; a large percentage of Cisco's cash is outside the U.S.

Mr. Chambers reiterated his cautious view of the U.S. economy, which he outlined last month when Cisco reported its latest quarterly results. "It's getting a little bit bumpy," he said, before adding that he remains bullish about Cisco's prospects.

Write to Cari Tuna at cari.tuna@wsj.com



Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703376504575491822536715854.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews#ixzz0zbOQgX7L

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

"Gold is a religion masquerading as an asset class"

Interesting link and conversation about Gold. Is it another commodity heading for a bust? Thanks Mac for the article Aivars Lode


http://www.businessinsider.com/gold-is-a-religion-2010-9

Sunday, September 12, 2010

In other words, get ready for $50 oil

Does it not strike anyone as bizarre that just a couple of years ago experts predicted a shortage of Oil and massive price increases? These sort of stories following run ups in commodity prices tend to support the hypothesis that there is significant manipulation of commodities prices.

Aivars Lode


What peak oil? Why an oil glut is ahead
oil_production.gi.top.jpgA worker operates an "nodding donkey " oil pump at an oil field near Baku, Azerbaijan. By Richard Martin, contributorSeptember 8, 2010: 5:49 AM ET

FORTUNE -- In May, less than a month after the blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico, a key milestone was achieved with little notice: Total U.S. supplies of petroleum and products refined from it (including the Strategic Petroleum Reserve) surpassed 1.8 billion barrels, reaching the highest level in the last 20 years. Since then the total has continued to edge upward, hitting 1.87 billion barrels in the week ended August 27, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Despite the Iraq War and the resulting production disruptions, despite the moratorium on drilling in the Gulf, despite turmoil in Nigeria and ongoing cross-border transshipment quarrels in Central Asia and the multiple, repeated declarations that "peak oil" has arrived and supplies will inevitably dwindle, the United States has more petroleum on hand today than it has had since at least the beginning of the first Gulf War.

Part of that surplus comes from increased oil and gas production, particularly from ongoing production in the non-OPEC countries (including the U.S., where a "shale gas boom" has created a natural-gas glut). It also comes from flat demand due to the stumbling economic recovery and changing consumer behaviors. Neither of those factors is guaranteed to last. But as the summer driving season passes and students head back to school, awareness has gradually dawned that we may be looking at an oil surplus for years to come.

"In the last 18 months we've seen this big trend emerge," says David Kirsch, research director at PFC Energy in Washington, D.C. "We spent five to 10 years in a supply-constrained market, characterized by the growth of the BRIC countries [Brazil, Russia, India and China] and concerns over the security of supplies."

Now, Kirsch remarks, because of the financial crisis and the time it will take to pare down the debt of the major OECD nations, demand growth over the next decade is likely to be lower than previously forecast.
0:00 /2:53Iraq: Oil production struggles

A new forecasting model

Official estimates of future oil supplies don't yet reflect this emerging consensus. Believing that "world oil prices will rise slowly as world oil demand increases because of projected global economic growth, slower growth in non-OPEC oil supply, and continued production restraint by members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)," the EIA forecasts that the spot price for West Texas Intermediate crude will start climbing again, averaging $81 per barrel in the fourth quarter of this year and $84 per barrel in 2011.

If government experts are wrong, though, we could see persistent surpluses and an oil price drifting toward $50 a barrel or even lower -- far below the $75-per-barrel that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia called a "fair price for oil" last year. Economists and policymakers have only begun to contemplate what that means.

New oil supplies are coming primarily from Central Asia and Iraq, where nearly a dozen major contracts have been finalized with foreign producers in 2010. The largest prize is the Rumaila Field, in southeast Iraq near the head of the Persian Gulf, with proven reserves 18 billion barrels. BP and China National Petroleum have signed a contract to jointly develop Rumaila. A report from the U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, issued in July, said that Iraqi production, currently around 2.4 million barrels per day (bpd), could reach 12 million bpd by 2017. Saudi Arabia currently produces around 8 million barrels a day.

In Central Asia, the grandiose predictions for the Caspian Sea basin heard in the late 1990s - "another Saudi Arabia" - are finally approaching reality. Kazakhstan, home of the two largest oil finds in recent decades -- the super-giant Tengiz and Kashagan fields - is building more pipeline capacity heading east, to the vibrant markets of East Asia, rather than west, through the tangled pipeline politics of the Caucasus.

Even Israel, long one of the biggest oil importers in the Middle East, is getting into the act. Last year the U.S. Geological Survey reported that Israeli waters in the Eastern Mediterranean contain more than 120 trillion cubic feet of recoverable gas reserves -- and new discoveries have added another potential 24 trillion or so since that report came out.

Questioning peak oil

At the same time, consumers have finally responded to higher gas prices and, perhaps, concern over the environmental impacts of burning fossil fuels. Miles driven by U.S. motorists have fallen over the last couple of years for the first time since such statistics have been collected, indicating that the American love affair with the automobile could be waning. And gasoline demand in China, the world's largest automotive market, may not skyrocket after all, as the government ramps up its drive to replace internal combustion engines with electric vehicles.

An Israeli economy running on, and exporting, large domestic supplies of natural gas is only the most glaring of the geopolitical game-changers that $50-per-barrel oil would entail. Big growth in Iraq's oil industry would lead that country into discussions, and possible disputes, with Saudi Arabia over OPEC's production quotas. The worldwide gas surplus has already reduced the incentive and ability for Vladimir Putin's Russia to engage in power games with gas importers in Eastern Europe. And, of course, cheaper oil from non-OPEC nations could limit the political focus in the U.S. on foreign oil supplies -- and reduce Congress's urgency to pass a comprehensive clean-energy bill.

More than anything, though, the looming oil surplus calls into question the concept of peak oil, at least in the near future, along with the whole science of forecasting future oil supplies. Adam Brandt, a professor at Stanford's Department of Energy Resources Engineering, released a study last month examining the various models that have been used to predict the future of world oil supplies. "Data do not support assertions that any one model type is most useful for forecasting future oil production," Brandt concludes. "In fact, evidence suggests that existing models have fared poorly in predicting global oil production."

In other words, get ready for $50 oil. To top of page